PCSX2 Wiki:General Discussions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:As for the dates, if you have in mind a separate column in testing tables I'd say that's not possible because someone would have to go through all existing cases and fill them with info manually. We have that kind of info of course (in pages history and forum messages) but who would do this crazy amount of work just to add this optional info? I admit this thought did cross my mind in the past but I put it aside as a whim (the only purpose I could think of is making it possible for the guy who played the game to wonder that another fellow played it a year ago, which is not much). | :As for the dates, if you have in mind a separate column in testing tables I'd say that's not possible because someone would have to go through all existing cases and fill them with info manually. We have that kind of info of course (in pages history and forum messages) but who would do this crazy amount of work just to add this optional info? I admit this thought did cross my mind in the past but I put it aside as a whim (the only purpose I could think of is making it possible for the guy who played the game to wonder that another fellow played it a year ago, which is not much). | ||
:However, if you think of adding the dates in the commentary field, I'm all for it. Unfortunately we could not use any tricks here, <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> couldn't be hidden in the template or added automatically on article commit, it's up to the editor to use it. --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 07:17, 20 July 2015 (BST) | :However, if you think of adding the dates in the commentary field, I'm all for it. Unfortunately we could not use any tricks here, <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki> couldn't be hidden in the template or added automatically on article commit, it's up to the editor to use it. --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 07:17, 20 July 2015 (BST) | ||
::Honestly, test cases where PCSX2 versions aren't given should just be removed or whatever. We can easily figure out the date from whatever version was used. If you happen to stumble upon a test case with a majority of "?" in there, and only a 'comment' then I don't even see a reason for it to be there. That's just my opinion on it though lol. And I'm not going to chase down test cases like this. But if I were to stumble on one by accident while editing a page then it wouldn't stop me from just getting rid of that entry if there's other more useful ones on that page. -- [[User:Ryudo|Ryudo]] ([[User talk:Ryudo|talk]]) 15:35, 20 July 2015 (BST) | |||