Talk:Shadow of the Colossus: Difference between revisions
→AMD CPU quality
Karasuhebi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
EddieHimself (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:Your CPU has an STR of 1506 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=1780); seeing as how my i5-4670K which has an STR of 2200+ doesn't get this game running constantly at full speed (what PCSX2 calls 60 "FPS") without heavy cycle hacks, I seriously doubt your CPU can do it without cranking up the cycle hacks, which is NOT ideal. | :Your CPU has an STR of 1506 (http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=1780); seeing as how my i5-4670K which has an STR of 2200+ doesn't get this game running constantly at full speed (what PCSX2 calls 60 "FPS") without heavy cycle hacks, I seriously doubt your CPU can do it without cranking up the cycle hacks, which is NOT ideal. | ||
:I agree that the whole "AMD sucks for emulation, get Intel" is pretty silly, but there's no denying Intel CPUs have higher IPC performance than AMD CPUs. Until we find a better way to easily communicate to users that they need a higher-performing CPU to play this game, let's leave it. -[[User:Karasuhebi|Karasuhebi]] ([[User talk:Karasuhebi|talk]]) 17:08, 4 September 2015 (BST) | :I agree that the whole "AMD sucks for emulation, get Intel" is pretty silly, but there's no denying Intel CPUs have higher IPC performance than AMD CPUs. Until we find a better way to easily communicate to users that they need a higher-performing CPU to play this game, let's leave it. -[[User:Karasuhebi|Karasuhebi]] ([[User talk:Karasuhebi|talk]]) 17:08, 4 September 2015 (BST) | ||
:: Ok, but it doesn't say in the article that it's 60fps without using cycle hacking. It recommends using VU cycle hack level 2 or 3. [[User:EddieHimself|EddieHimself]] ([[User talk:EddieHimself|talk]]) 19:44, 14 April 2016 (BST) |