User talk:Ngng: Difference between revisions

m
→‎VS2 WS patch: what's a VS2? fixed cause I am dumb
(→‎VS2 WS patch: new section)
m (→‎VS2 WS patch: what's a VS2? fixed cause I am dumb)
Line 1,205: Line 1,205:
:Thanks that is good to know, because it seemed a little intimidating trying to update that list correctly. --[[User:Flang|Flang]] ([[User talk:Flang|talk]]) 10:21, 22 July 2016 (CST)
:Thanks that is good to know, because it seemed a little intimidating trying to update that list correctly. --[[User:Flang|Flang]] ([[User talk:Flang|talk]]) 10:21, 22 July 2016 (CST)


== VS2 WS patch ==
== VP2 WS patch ==


Please check your facts before reverting edits. The VS2 WS patch was removed from the archive in this commit [https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2/commit/8e8b8f8ed537947da83725d01ca0617a6ee7bb0f]. It should never have made it in there, because it triggers the games cheating protection and at the very least reproducibly freezes the game in various places, in addition to possibly flagging the save and causing more subtle long-term issues (drop rates and such).
Please check your facts before reverting edits. The VP2 WS patch was removed from the archive in this commit [https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2/commit/8e8b8f8ed537947da83725d01ca0617a6ee7bb0f]. It should never have made it in there, because it triggers the games cheating protection and at the very least reproducibly freezes the game in various places, in addition to possibly flagging the save and causing more subtle long-term issues (drop rates and such).
I stated as much in the changelog.  
I stated as much in the changelog.  


What's the issue here? That the patch is still in the last stable release archive? Even if so, it's buggy and shouldn't be advertised. The game includes a native 16:9 progressive option that should be used instead. [[User:Eloris|Eloris]] ([[User talk:Eloris|talk]]) 18:54, 11 August 2016 (BST)
What's the issue here? That the patch is still in the last stable release archive? Even if so, it's buggy and shouldn't be advertised. The game includes a native 16:9 progressive option that should be used instead. [[User:Eloris|Eloris]] ([[User talk:Eloris|talk]]) 18:54, 11 August 2016 (BST)
ninja
13

edits