Bureaucrats, ninja, Administrators
67,565
edits
User talk:Ngng: Difference between revisions
a small poll
(a small poll) |
|||
| Line 864: | Line 864: | ||
:::I think anyone can use Community Portal just fine, and I'll be totally fine with it. Btw user rights management (i.e. making a ninja of any new user) and page deletion are all my "special" rights. | :::I think anyone can use Community Portal just fine, and I'll be totally fine with it. Btw user rights management (i.e. making a ninja of any new user) and page deletion are all my "special" rights. | ||
:::As for General Discussions page you can create it, fill it will some starting info and make a link from Community Portal. But I'm really struggling to believe that having two similar pages here would be wise. It's not a million user wiki or Wikipedia after all. --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2015 (BST) | :::As for General Discussions page you can create it, fill it will some starting info and make a link from Community Portal. But I'm really struggling to believe that having two similar pages here would be wise. It's not a million user wiki or Wikipedia after all. --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2015 (BST) | ||
== New place for discussions (cont.) == | |||
While waiting for SHunter to finally reappear, I took the liberty to create a comparison page with different icon sizes. I had the suspicion that they look too big and now I'm sure of it. Please take a look at [[User:Ngng/test1|this page]]. The first infobox has the 55 pixel width icons at their current "native" resolution. The following infoboxes have 40, 35, 30 and 25 px icons accordingly. Talking the size of the infobox itself into account it looks that 55 pixels size is not reasonable. I'd say only the last variant seems to have too small icons but all those inbetween look better than the first. Which one will you prefer, guys? --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 19:56, 19 June 2015 (BST) | |||