Bureaucrats, ninja, Administrators
67,565
edits
User talk:Ngng: Difference between revisions
→New Template
| Line 434: | Line 434: | ||
I've made three templates: [[Template:TestingHeader]], [[Template:TestingFooter]] and [[Template:TestingEntry]] (the later has some info about its usage). If you have any ideas just go ahead and edit the templates (we can always revert to any version). --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 09:18, 27 July 2014 (BST) | I've made three templates: [[Template:TestingHeader]], [[Template:TestingFooter]] and [[Template:TestingEntry]] (the later has some info about its usage). If you have any ideas just go ahead and edit the templates (we can always revert to any version). --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 09:18, 27 July 2014 (BST) | ||
::I'm really clueless when it comes to wiki templates, but is it possible to have 2 parameters in the same cell? So that the CPU/GPU column can automatically sort them into list? [[User:Tonygiang|Tonygiang]] ([[User talk:Tonygiang|talk]]) 13:52, 28 July 2014 (BST) | ::I'm really clueless when it comes to wiki templates, but is it possible to have 2 parameters in the same cell? So that the CPU/GPU column can automatically sort them into list? [[User:Tonygiang|Tonygiang]] ([[User talk:Tonygiang|talk]]) 13:52, 28 July 2014 (BST) | ||
:I think this is the way it's done right now (if I understand you correctly). What really concerns me is how this will look on the games' pages because without any other info and only two tables on the page (game card table on the right pane and this testing table in the middle) it may really look ugly :-\. | |||
:What do you think, should we proceed now or should we wait for any other opinions on the testing table (because it will be harder to change it later)? --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 06:28, 29 July 2014 (BST) | |||