User talk:Ngng: Difference between revisions

Line 416: Line 416:
:Also more info about "wiki tables" can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table here] and [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Tables here].
:Also more info about "wiki tables" can be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table here] and [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Tables here].
:--[[User:SHunter|Shunter]] ([[User talk:SHunter|talk]]) 12:43, 22 July 2014 (GMT-5)
:--[[User:SHunter|Shunter]] ([[User talk:SHunter|talk]]) 12:43, 22 July 2014 (GMT-5)
::The style looks nicer, although it could use a border-collapse style to save some screen space real estate. The sample comment about the issues of the games are just examples of what the testers would have a say on, not what they are obligated to repeat in every entry. They could have some comment about the performance of particular hardware, how far they could push the game above standard testing condition (which is always native resolution and no graphical enhancement), etc... Like you said, it's a performance reference table, but we can only make it so with some space for the testers to tell us about the performance they got, don't we?
::I don't think speedhacks need a separate column since as the devs said, test results are assumed to have no kind of hacks enabled (because technically, they are hack-ey by default and could mangle test results, hence not very useful for the devs to look at). Mentioning of speedhacks is only necessary if they generate different results. My terrible example entry did not reflect those things very well and might have given you an impression that speedhacks need to be explicit for every entry. That one example alone should in no way be the guideline to make test entries.
::I have no clue about a CDVD plugin column. Are CDVD plugins really complicated to configure or lacking in compatibility that users would find it helpful to have it explicit? [[User:Tonygiang|Tonygiang]] ([[User talk:Tonygiang|talk]]) 10:20, 24 July 2014 (BST)
196

edits