User talk:Ngng: Difference between revisions

m
m (wrong titling...)
Line 869: Line 869:


While waiting for SHunter to finally reappear, I took the liberty to create a comparison page with different icon sizes. I had the suspicion that they look too big and now I'm sure of it. Please take a look at [[User:Ngng/test1|this page]]. The first infobox has the 55 pixel width icons at their current "native" resolution. The following infoboxes have 40, 35, 30 and 25 px icons accordingly. Talking the size of the infobox itself into account it looks that 55 pixels size is not reasonable. I'd say only the last variant seems to have too small icons but all those inbetween look better than the first. Which one will you prefer, guys? --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 19:56, 19 June 2015 (BST)
While waiting for SHunter to finally reappear, I took the liberty to create a comparison page with different icon sizes. I had the suspicion that they look too big and now I'm sure of it. Please take a look at [[User:Ngng/test1|this page]]. The first infobox has the 55 pixel width icons at their current "native" resolution. The following infoboxes have 40, 35, 30 and 25 px icons accordingly. Talking the size of the infobox itself into account it looks that 55 pixels size is not reasonable. I'd say only the last variant seems to have too small icons but all those inbetween look better than the first. Which one will you prefer, guys? --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 19:56, 19 June 2015 (BST)
:I decided to commit the changes with 35x35px icons. It's been almost two months already, so...
:@SHunter: I'll edit some of your icons if the new resolution will require, but you can finish them anytime you'll be back. --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 16:21, 2 July 2015 (BST)
67,565

edits