User talk:Ngng: Difference between revisions

m
Line 468: Line 468:
And what sizes should the icons be? Currently I'm making all these icons as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_graphics vectors images] meaning I can scale the icons however I want without any loss of quality.
And what sizes should the icons be? Currently I'm making all these icons as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_graphics vectors images] meaning I can scale the icons however I want without any loss of quality.
--[[User:SHunter|SHunter]] 1:17, 1 January 2015 (GMT-5)
--[[User:SHunter|SHunter]] 1:17, 1 January 2015 (GMT-5)
:I like the design. A couple of ideas I can think of (I'm not at home so I can't use the pc to make images as example):
#You can try to make the blue part of the gradient match any of the blue colors used on the infobox, if not done yet (using the hex code).
#Another posibility is having 2 versions of the icons, to differentiate, if the option is available or not. Then we would need 3 icons (with their special version): progressive (available/unavailable), native 16:9 (available/unavailable) and widescreen patch (available/unavailable):
*Normal version as it is now
*Grayscale, or darker, or brighter version, to show that the given option is not available
#Progressive scan can have arrow tips pointing to the right, and a small '''p''' on the botton right corner
#16:9, "widescreen patch", and "no wideecreen patch" can have a line with arrow tips pointing to both sides.
#"No widescreen patch" (if used) icon should include the same "tool icon" (dont know its name), so the viewer can easily tell it refers to the fact that widescreen patches aren't available.
ninja
805

edits