PCSX2 Wiki:General Discussions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Karasuhebi (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==New field in the testing templates== What do you guys think of adding a new field to the testing templates for date submitted? It'd be nice to have a frame of reference for...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What do you guys think of adding a new field to the testing templates for date submitted? It'd be nice to have a frame of reference for when a certain test was performed. Specially since sometimes people don't include the version of PCSX2 they're using. XD -[[User:Karasuhebi|Karasuhebi]] ([[User talk:Karasuhebi|talk]]) 08:07, 19 July 2015 (BST) | What do you guys think of adding a new field to the testing templates for date submitted? It'd be nice to have a frame of reference for when a certain test was performed. Specially since sometimes people don't include the version of PCSX2 they're using. XD -[[User:Karasuhebi|Karasuhebi]] ([[User talk:Karasuhebi|talk]]) 08:07, 19 July 2015 (BST) | ||
::Should be simple to implement. <pre>~~~~~</pre> ^ If we add a hidden field where this is automatically placed for a user then it'll be automatically signed with a time and date. (Like you would normally sign your chats here with 4 of those characters so your name is included.) -- [[User:Ryudo|Ryudo]] ([[User talk:Ryudo|talk]]) 10:17, 19 July 2015 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 09:17, 19 July 2015
New field in the testing templates
What do you guys think of adding a new field to the testing templates for date submitted? It'd be nice to have a frame of reference for when a certain test was performed. Specially since sometimes people don't include the version of PCSX2 they're using. XD -Karasuhebi (talk) 08:07, 19 July 2015 (BST)
- Should be simple to implement.
~~~~~
^ If we add a hidden field where this is automatically placed for a user then it'll be automatically signed with a time and date. (Like you would normally sign your chats here with 4 of those characters so your name is included.) -- Ryudo (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2015 (BST)
- Should be simple to implement.