Bureaucrats, ninja, Administrators
67,565
edits
Talk:Kanokon: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Refraction (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Please can we not use the original game cover for this game. Google is picking it up as a violation of their policies as it is classed as "Adult content" which stops our ad...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please can we not use the original game cover for this game. Google is picking it up as a violation of their policies as it is classed as "Adult content" which stops our ad revenue. We suggest using the novel cover as an alternative. | Please can we not use the original game cover for this game. Google is picking it up as a violation of their policies as it is classed as "Adult content" which stops our ad revenue. We suggest using the novel cover as an alternative. - Refraction | ||
:Ha-ha! I'm not surprised. Google is partly responsible for the sorry state the Internet is in today (corpocracy and censorship). Was it the only image they flagged? Will this [https://gamefaqs.akamaized.net/box/9/7/8/95978_front.jpg alternative image] be acceptable in your opinion? --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 16:57, 18 February 2018 (GMT) | |||
It is crazy I know! This is the only image they have mentioned so far. Hmm not sure if that will be acceptable due to the excessive amount of bust in the picture! For now if we could use some of the novel cover art such as this [https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_large/6/67663/3321433-01.jpg novel cover] At least until the violation is cleared, then we can try the alternative cover. --[[User:Refraction|Refraction]] ([[User talk:Refraction|talk]]) 17:09, 18 February 2018 (GMT) | |||
:Okay, although it's not a PS2 cover (but whatever). There's also this second alternative from [https://www.amazon.co.jp/PS2%E3%82%B2%E3%83%BC%E3%83%A0%E3%80%8C%E3%81%8B%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%82%93-%E3%81%88%E3%81%99%E3%81%84%E3%83%BC%E3%80%8D%E3%82%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%83%97%E3%83%8B%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0%E3%83%86%E3%83%BC%E3%83%9E%E3%80%8CHappy-Succession%E3%80%8D%E3%80%90%E5%88%9D%E5%9B%9E%E9%99%90%E5%AE%9A%E7%9B%A4%E3%80%91-DVD%E4%BB%98-%E5%AE%AE%E5%B4%8E%E7%BE%BD%E8%A1%A3/dp/B001BDUZUK Amazon]. Please drop a message after the violation is lifted (if you remember about it by then) --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 17:22, 18 February 2018 (GMT) | |||
:Will do, thanks :) The amazon one might be better, but I'll let you know once the violation has cleared, might be about a month. --[[User:Refraction|Refraction]] ([[User talk:Refraction|talk]]) 17:30, 18 February 2018 (GMT) | |||
:Got a reply from google, they have said it was a "false positive" (after I explained we don't run ads on here) so you can put it back :P Possibly use the alternate cover you found, it's a little less racy lol --[[User:Refraction|Refraction]] ([[User talk:Refraction|talk]]) 12:42, 21 February 2018 (GMT) | |||
It's a good news, thank you. PS2 games are so family friendly and so devoid of any suggestiveness so I kinda like the original cover. But, oh well, I'll restore the less risky cover just in case (to avoid any future "false positives"). --[[User:Ngng|Ngng]] ([[User talk:Ngng|talk]]) 13:26, 21 February 2018 (GMT) | |||